aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/doc/FAQ.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/FAQ.md')
-rw-r--r--doc/FAQ.md44
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/FAQ.md b/doc/FAQ.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4c69763f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/FAQ.md
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
1#FAQ
2### Why did you create Shaarli ?
3
4I was a StumbleUpon user. Then I got fed up with they big toolbar. I switched to delicious, which was lighter, faster and more beautiful. Until Yahoo bought it. Then the export API broke all the time, delicious became slow and was ditched by Yahoo. I switched to Diigo, which is not bad, but does too much. And Diigo is sslllooooowww and their Firefox extension a bit buggy. And… oh… **their Firefox addon sends to Diigo every single URL you visit** (Don't believe me ? Use [Tamper Data](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tamper-data/) and open any page).[](.html)
5
6Enough is enough. Saving simple links should not be a complicated heavy thing. I ditched them all and wrote my own: Shaarli. It's simple, but it does the job and does it well. And my data is not hosted on a foreign server, but on my server.
7
8### Why use Shaarli and not Delicious/Diigo ?
9
10With Shaarli:
11
12* The data is yours: It's hosted on your server.
13* Never fear of having your data locked-in.
14* Never fear to have your data sold to third party.
15* Your private links are not hosted on a third party server.
16* You are not tracked by browser addons (like Diigo does)
17* You can change the look and feel of the pages if you want.
18* You can change the behaviour of the program.
19* It's magnitude faster than most bookmarking services.
20
21### What does Shaarli mean?
22
23Shaarli is for shaaring your links.
24
25### My Shaarli is broken!
26First of all, ensure that both the [web server](Server-configuration) and [Shaarli](Shaarli-configuration) are correctly configured, and that your installation is [supported](Server-requirements).[](.html)
27
28If everything looks right but the issue(s) remain(s), please:
29- take a look at the [troubleshooting](Troubleshooting) section[](.html)
30- come [chat with us](https://gitter.im/shaarli/Shaarli) on Gitter, we'll be happy to help ;-)[](.html)
31- browse active [issues](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/issues) and [Pull Requests](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/pulls)[](.html)
32 - if you find one that is related to the issue, feel free to comment and provide additional details (host/Shaarli setup)
33 - else, [open a new issue](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/issues/new), and provide information about the problem:[](.html)
34 - _what happens?_ - display glitches, invalid data, security flaws...
35 - _what is your configuration?_ - OS, server version, activated extensions, web browser...
36 - _is it reproducible?_
37
38### Why not use a real database? Files are slow!
39
40Does browsing [this page](http://sebsauvage.net/links/) feel slow? Try browsing older pages, too.[](.html)
41
42It's not slow at all, is it? And don't forget the database contains more than 16000 links, and it's on a shared host, with 32000 visitors/day for my website alone. And it's still damn fast. Why?
43
44The data file is only 3.7 Mb. It's read 99% of the time, and is probably already in the operation system disk cache. So generating a page involves no I/O at all most of the time.