diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/md/FAQ.md')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/md/FAQ.md | 46 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 46 deletions
diff --git a/doc/md/FAQ.md b/doc/md/FAQ.md deleted file mode 100644 index a2ec7d57..00000000 --- a/doc/md/FAQ.md +++ /dev/null | |||
@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@ | |||
1 | ### Why did you create Shaarli ? | ||
2 | |||
3 | I was a StumbleUpon user. Then I got fed up with they big toolbar. I switched to delicious, which was lighter, faster and more beautiful. Until Yahoo bought it. Then the export API broke all the time, delicious became slow and was ditched by Yahoo. I switched to Diigo, which is not bad, but does too much. And Diigo is sslllooooowww and their Firefox extension a bit buggy. And… oh… **their Firefox addon sends to Diigo every single URL you visit** (Don't believe me ? Use [Tamper Data](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tamper-data/) and open any page). | ||
4 | |||
5 | Enough is enough. Saving simple links should not be a complicated heavy thing. I ditched them all and wrote my own: Shaarli. It's simple, but it does the job and does it well. And my data is not hosted on a foreign server, but on my server. | ||
6 | |||
7 | ### Why use Shaarli and not Delicious/Diigo ? | ||
8 | |||
9 | With Shaarli: | ||
10 | |||
11 | - The data is yours: It's hosted on your server. | ||
12 | - Never fear of having your data locked-in. | ||
13 | - Never fear to have your data sold to third party. | ||
14 | - Your private links are not hosted on a third party server. | ||
15 | - You are not tracked by browser addons (like Diigo does) | ||
16 | - You can change the look and feel of the pages if you want. | ||
17 | - You can change the behaviour of the program. | ||
18 | - It's magnitude faster than most bookmarking services. | ||
19 | |||
20 | ### What does Shaarli mean? | ||
21 | |||
22 | Shaarli stands for _shaaring_ your _links_. | ||
23 | |||
24 | ### My Shaarli is broken! | ||
25 | First of all, ensure that both the [web server](Server-configuration) and | ||
26 | [Shaarli](Shaarli-configuration) are correctly configured, and that your | ||
27 | installation is [supported](Server-configuration). | ||
28 | |||
29 | If everything looks right but the issue(s) remain(s), please: | ||
30 | |||
31 | - take a look at the [troubleshooting](Troubleshooting) section | ||
32 | - come [chat with us](https://gitter.im/shaarli/Shaarli) on Gitter, we'll be happy to help ;-) | ||
33 | - browse active [issues](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/issues) and [Pull Requests](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/pulls) | ||
34 | - if you find one that is related to the issue, feel free to comment and provide additional details (host/Shaarli setup) | ||
35 | - else, [open a new issue](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/issues/new), and provide information about the problem: | ||
36 | - _what happens?_ - display glitches, invalid data, security flaws... | ||
37 | - _what is your configuration?_ - OS, server version, activated extensions, web browser... | ||
38 | - _is it reproducible?_ | ||
39 | |||
40 | ### Why not use a real database? Files are slow! | ||
41 | |||
42 | Does browsing [this page](http://sebsauvage.net/links/) feel slow? Try browsing older pages, too. | ||
43 | |||
44 | It's not slow at all, is it? And don't forget the database contains more than 16000 links, and it's on a shared host, with 32000 visitors/day for my website alone. And it's still damn fast. Why? | ||
45 | |||
46 | The data file is only 3.7 Mb. It's read 99% of the time, and is probably already in the operation system disk cache. So generating a page involves no I/O at all most of the time. | ||