]> git.immae.eu Git - github/shaarli/Shaarli.git/blame - doc/md/FAQ.md
Merge pull request #1552 from ArthurHoaro/feature/better-initializer
[github/shaarli/Shaarli.git] / doc / md / FAQ.md
CommitLineData
992af0b9
V
1### Why did you create Shaarli ?
2
53ed6d7d 3I was a StumbleUpon user. Then I got fed up with they big toolbar. I switched to delicious, which was lighter, faster and more beautiful. Until Yahoo bought it. Then the export API broke all the time, delicious became slow and was ditched by Yahoo. I switched to Diigo, which is not bad, but does too much. And Diigo is sslllooooowww and their Firefox extension a bit buggy. And… oh… **their Firefox addon sends to Diigo every single URL you visit** (Don't believe me ? Use [Tamper Data](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tamper-data/) and open any page).
992af0b9
V
4
5Enough is enough. Saving simple links should not be a complicated heavy thing. I ditched them all and wrote my own: Shaarli. It's simple, but it does the job and does it well. And my data is not hosted on a foreign server, but on my server.
6
7### Why use Shaarli and not Delicious/Diigo ?
8
9With Shaarli:
10
43ad7c8e
V
11- The data is yours: It's hosted on your server.
12- Never fear of having your data locked-in.
13- Never fear to have your data sold to third party.
14- Your private links are not hosted on a third party server.
15- You are not tracked by browser addons (like Diigo does)
16- You can change the look and feel of the pages if you want.
17- You can change the behaviour of the program.
18- It's magnitude faster than most bookmarking services.
992af0b9
V
19
20### What does Shaarli mean?
21
43ad7c8e 22Shaarli stands for _shaaring_ your _links_.
992af0b9
V
23
24### My Shaarli is broken!
87f14312
V
25First of all, ensure that both the [web server](Server-configuration) and
26[Shaarli](Shaarli-configuration) are correctly configured, and that your
27installation is [supported](Server-configuration).
992af0b9
V
28
29If everything looks right but the issue(s) remain(s), please:
43ad7c8e 30
53ed6d7d 31- take a look at the [troubleshooting](Troubleshooting) section
32- come [chat with us](https://gitter.im/shaarli/Shaarli) on Gitter, we'll be happy to help ;-)
33- browse active [issues](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/issues) and [Pull Requests](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/pulls)
992af0b9 34 - if you find one that is related to the issue, feel free to comment and provide additional details (host/Shaarli setup)
53ed6d7d 35 - else, [open a new issue](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/issues/new), and provide information about the problem:
992af0b9
V
36 - _what happens?_ - display glitches, invalid data, security flaws...
37 - _what is your configuration?_ - OS, server version, activated extensions, web browser...
38 - _is it reproducible?_
39
40### Why not use a real database? Files are slow!
41
53ed6d7d 42Does browsing [this page](http://sebsauvage.net/links/) feel slow? Try browsing older pages, too.
992af0b9
V
43
44It's not slow at all, is it? And don't forget the database contains more than 16000 links, and it's on a shared host, with 32000 visitors/day for my website alone. And it's still damn fast. Why?
45
46The data file is only 3.7 Mb. It's read 99% of the time, and is probably already in the operation system disk cache. So generating a page involves no I/O at all most of the time.