+## Which container formats can I use for the videos I want to upload?
+
+WEBM, MP4 or OGV videos are supported by default (they are streamable formats),
+but instance administrators can additionally enable support for MKV, MOV, AVI
+and FLV formats when transcoding is enabled on their instance.
+
+
+## I want to change my domain name, how can I do that?
+
+You can't. You'll need to reinstall an instance and reupload your videos.
+
+
+## Why do we have to put our Twitter username in PeerTube configuration?
+
+You don't have to: we set a default value if you don't have a Twitter account.
+We need this information because Twitter requires an account for links share/videos embed on their platform.
+
+
+## How video views are calculated?
+
+Your web browser sends a view to the server after 30 seconds of playback. Then, the IP cannot send another view in the next hour.
+Views are buffered, so don't panic if the view counter stays the same after you watched a video.
+
+
+## Should I have a big server to run PeerTube?
+
+Not really. For instance, the demonstration server [https://peertube.cpy.re](https://peertube.cpy.re) has 2 vCore and 2GB of RAM and consumes on average:
+ * **CPU** -> nginx ~ 20%, peertube ~ 10%, postgres ~ 1%, redis ~ 3%
+ * **RAM** -> nginx ~ 6MB, peertube ~ 120MB, postgres ~ 10MB, redis ~ 5MB
+
+So you would need:
+ * **CPU** 1 core if you don't enable transcoding, 2 at least if you enable it (works with 1 but this is really slow)
+ * **RAM** 1GB
+ * **Storage** Completely depends on how many videos your users will upload
+
+
+## Can I seed videos with my classic BitTorrent client (Transmission, rTorrent...)?
+
+Yes you can, but you won't be able to send data to users that watch the video in their web browser.
+The reason is they connect to peers through WebRTC whereas your BitTorrent client uses classic TCP/UDP.
+To check if your BitTorrent client supports WebTorrent you can see this issue: https://github.com/webtorrent/webtorrent/issues/369
+
+
+## Why host on GitHub and Framagit?
+
+The project has initially been hosted on GitHub by Chocobozzz. A full migration to [Framagit](https://framagit.org/chocobozzz/PeerTube) would be ideal now that Framasoft supports PeerTube, but it would take a lot of time and is an ongoing effort.
+
+
+## Are you going to use the Steem blockchain?
+
+Short answer: no, since like most appchains/votechains, it modifies the dynamic of creation, and as such cannot be integrated into mainline PeerTube. Read more about that in [the dedicated section](#what-is-creation-dynamic-and-why-not-modify-it).
+
+Long answer is that the Steem blockchain goes astray of its promises of fairness and decentralization: the deliberate relaunching of the currency to ensure centralization, and the stake-based voting power, makes manipulation by wealthy users inevitable ([source here](https://decentralize.today/the-ugly-truth-behind-steemit-1a525f5e156)).
+Worse, money generated primarily goes to stakeholders ([source here](https://steemit.com/steemit/@orly/how-the-steem-pyramid-scheme-really-works) ).
+For more information, read the complete whitepaper analysis done by [Tone Vays](https://twitter.com/ToneVays/status/761975587451928576).
+
+## Are you going to support advertisements?
+
+Short answer: no, we don't want advertisers to dictate which content should be financed.
+That would modify the dynamic of creation; as such it cannot be integrated into mainline PeerTube.
+Read more about that in [the dedicated section](#what-is-creation-dynamic-and-why-not-modify-it).
+
+The long answer is probably more subtle. YouTube has shaped generations of video creators by making it easy to place ads;
+but making big money with the platform can be a challenge.
+A typical video ad runs between $.10 and $.30 per 1000 views (as of March 2018).
+More than 70% of video creators use ads as the main way to make money on YouTube, yet less than 3% of video creators make a living out of their YouTube activity (with partnerships and commissions, otherwise counting only ad revenue it drops to 1%).
+Read more about it in the 2018 study by Mathias Bärtl, [*YouTube channels, uploads and views: A statistical analysis of the past 10 years*](https://www.dropbox.com/s/0cq4wtxm83s95t2/10.1177%401354856517736979.pdf?dl=0).
+To the best of our knowledge, small and medium-community creators are better off getting support from their community on platforms such as Liberapay, Tipeee or Patreon.
+Moreover, don't forget that advertisers already pay considering YouTube's large user base; with PeerTube's way smaller user base and refusal of user profiling, a pay-per-view that's lower than YouTube's could only be expected.
+
+## What is "creation dynamic" and why not modify it?