package cty import ( "bytes" "fmt" "hash/crc32" "math/big" "sort" "github.com/zclconf/go-cty/cty/set" ) // setRules provides a Rules implementation for the ./set package that // respects the equality rules for cty values of the given type. // // This implementation expects that values added to the set will be // valid internal values for the given Type, which is to say that wrapping // the given value in a Value struct along with the ruleset's type should // produce a valid, working Value. type setRules struct { Type Type } var _ set.OrderedRules = setRules{} // Hash returns a hash value for the receiver that can be used for equality // checks where some inaccuracy is tolerable. // // The hash function is value-type-specific, so it is not meaningful to compare // hash results for values of different types. // // This function is not safe to use for security-related applications, since // the hash used is not strong enough. func (val Value) Hash() int { hashBytes := makeSetHashBytes(val) return int(crc32.ChecksumIEEE(hashBytes)) } func (r setRules) Hash(v interface{}) int { return Value{ ty: r.Type, v: v, }.Hash() } func (r setRules) Equivalent(v1 interface{}, v2 interface{}) bool { v1v := Value{ ty: r.Type, v: v1, } v2v := Value{ ty: r.Type, v: v2, } eqv := v1v.Equals(v2v) // By comparing the result to true we ensure that an Unknown result, // which will result if either value is unknown, will be considered // as non-equivalent. Two unknown values are not equivalent for the // sake of set membership. return eqv.v == true } // Less is an implementation of set.OrderedRules so that we can iterate over // set elements in a consistent order, where such an order is possible. func (r setRules) Less(v1, v2 interface{}) bool { v1v := Value{ ty: r.Type, v: v1, } v2v := Value{ ty: r.Type, v: v2, } if v1v.RawEquals(v2v) { // Easy case: if they are equal then v1 can't be less return false } // Null values always sort after non-null values if v2v.IsNull() && !v1v.IsNull() { return true } else if v1v.IsNull() { return false } // Unknown values always sort after known values if v1v.IsKnown() && !v2v.IsKnown() { return true } else if !v1v.IsKnown() { return false } switch r.Type { case String: // String values sort lexicographically return v1v.AsString() < v2v.AsString() case Bool: // Weird to have a set of bools, but if we do then false sorts before true. if v2v.True() || !v1v.True() { return true } return false case Number: v1f := v1v.AsBigFloat() v2f := v2v.AsBigFloat() return v1f.Cmp(v2f) < 0 default: // No other types have a well-defined ordering, so we just produce a // default consistent-but-undefined ordering then. This situation is // not considered a compatibility constraint; callers should rely only // on the ordering rules for primitive values. v1h := makeSetHashBytes(v1v) v2h := makeSetHashBytes(v2v) return bytes.Compare(v1h, v2h) < 0 } } func makeSetHashBytes(val Value) []byte { var buf bytes.Buffer appendSetHashBytes(val, &buf) return buf.Bytes() } func appendSetHashBytes(val Value, buf *bytes.Buffer) { // Exactly what bytes we generate here don't matter as long as the following // constraints hold: // - Unknown and null values all generate distinct strings from // each other and from any normal value of the given type. // - The delimiter used to separate items in a compound structure can // never appear literally in any of its elements. // Since we don't support hetrogenous lists we don't need to worry about // collisions between values of different types, apart from // PseudoTypeDynamic. // If in practice we *do* get a collision then it's not a big deal because // the Equivalent function will still distinguish values, but set // performance will be best if we are able to produce a distinct string // for each distinct value, unknown values notwithstanding. if !val.IsKnown() { buf.WriteRune('?') return } if val.IsNull() { buf.WriteRune('~') return } switch val.ty { case Number: buf.WriteString(val.v.(*big.Float).String()) return case Bool: if val.v.(bool) { buf.WriteRune('T') } else { buf.WriteRune('F') } return case String: buf.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("%q", val.v.(string))) return } if val.ty.IsMapType() { buf.WriteRune('{') val.ForEachElement(func(keyVal, elementVal Value) bool { appendSetHashBytes(keyVal, buf) buf.WriteRune(':') appendSetHashBytes(elementVal, buf) buf.WriteRune(';') return false }) buf.WriteRune('}') return } if val.ty.IsListType() || val.ty.IsSetType() { buf.WriteRune('[') val.ForEachElement(func(keyVal, elementVal Value) bool { appendSetHashBytes(elementVal, buf) buf.WriteRune(';') return false }) buf.WriteRune(']') return } if val.ty.IsObjectType() { buf.WriteRune('<') attrNames := make([]string, 0, len(val.ty.AttributeTypes())) for attrName := range val.ty.AttributeTypes() { attrNames = append(attrNames, attrName) } sort.Strings(attrNames) for _, attrName := range attrNames { appendSetHashBytes(val.GetAttr(attrName), buf) buf.WriteRune(';') } buf.WriteRune('>') return } if val.ty.IsTupleType() { buf.WriteRune('<') val.ForEachElement(func(keyVal, elementVal Value) bool { appendSetHashBytes(elementVal, buf) buf.WriteRune(';') return false }) buf.WriteRune('>') return } // should never get down here panic("unsupported type in set hash") }