[github/shaarli/Shaarli.git] / doc / FAQ.md

#FAQ
### Why did you create Shaarli ?

I was a StumbleUpon user. Then I got fed up with they big toolbar. I switched to delicious, which was lighter, faster and more beautiful. Until Yahoo bought it. Then the export API broke all the time, delicious became slow and was ditched by Yahoo. I switched to Diigo, which is not bad, but does too much. And Diigo is sslllooooowww and their Firefox extension a bit buggy. And… oh… **their Firefox addon sends to Diigo every single URL you visit** (Don't believe me ? Use [Tamper Data](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tamper-data/) and open any page).[](.html)

Enough is enough. Saving simple links should not be a complicated heavy thing. I ditched them all and wrote my own: Shaarli. It's simple, but it does the job and does it well. And my data is not hosted on a foreign server, but on my server.

### Why use Shaarli and not Delicious/Diigo ?

With Shaarli:

*     The data is yours: It's hosted on your server.
*     Never fear of having your data locked-in.
*     Never fear to have your data sold to third party.
*     Your private links are not hosted on a third party server.
*     You are not tracked by browser addons (like Diigo does)
*     You can change the look and feel of the pages if you want.
*     You can change the behaviour of the program.
*     It's magnitude faster than most bookmarking services.

### What does Shaarli mean?

Shaarli is for shaaring your links.

### My Shaarli is broken!
First of all, ensure that both the [web server](Server-configuration) and [Shaarli](Shaarli-configuration) are correctly configured, and that your installation is [supported](Server-requirements).[](.html)

If everything looks right but the issue(s) remain(s), please:
- take a look at the [troubleshooting](Troubleshooting) section[](.html)
- come [chat with us](https://gitter.im/shaarli/Shaarli) on Gitter, we'll be happy to help ;-)[](.html)
- browse active [issues](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/issues) and [Pull Requests](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/pulls)[](.html)
    - if you find one that is related to the issue, feel free to comment and provide additional details (host/Shaarli setup)
    - else, [open a new issue](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/issues/new), and provide information about the problem:[](.html)
        - _what happens?_ - display glitches, invalid data, security flaws...
        - _what is your configuration?_  - OS, server version, activated extensions, web browser...
        - _is it reproducible?_

### Why not use a real database? Files are slow!

Does browsing [this page](http://sebsauvage.net/links/) feel slow? Try browsing older pages, too.[](.html)

It's not slow at all, is it? And don't forget the database contains more than 16000 links, and it's on a shared host, with 32000 visitors/day for my website alone. And it's still damn fast. Why?

The data file is only 3.7 Mb. It's read 99% of the time, and is probably already in the operation system disk cache. So generating a page involves no I/O at all most of the time.
Commit	Line	Data
992af0b9 V	1	#FAQ
	2	### Why did you create Shaarli ?
	3
	4	I was a StumbleUpon user. Then I got fed up with they big toolbar. I switched to delicious, which was lighter, faster and more beautiful. Until Yahoo bought it. Then the export API broke all the time, delicious became slow and was ditched by Yahoo. I switched to Diigo, which is not bad, but does too much. And Diigo is sslllooooowww and their Firefox extension a bit buggy. And… oh… their Firefox addon sends to Diigo every single URL you visit (Don't believe me ? Use [Tamper Data](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tamper-data/) and open any page).[](.html)
	5
	6	Enough is enough. Saving simple links should not be a complicated heavy thing. I ditched them all and wrote my own: Shaarli. It's simple, but it does the job and does it well. And my data is not hosted on a foreign server, but on my server.
	7
	8	### Why use Shaarli and not Delicious/Diigo ?
	9
	10	With Shaarli:
	11
	12	* The data is yours: It's hosted on your server.
	13	* Never fear of having your data locked-in.
	14	* Never fear to have your data sold to third party.
	15	* Your private links are not hosted on a third party server.
	16	* You are not tracked by browser addons (like Diigo does)
	17	* You can change the look and feel of the pages if you want.
	18	* You can change the behaviour of the program.
	19	* It's magnitude faster than most bookmarking services.
	20
	21	### What does Shaarli mean?
	22
	23	Shaarli is for shaaring your links.
	24
	25	### My Shaarli is broken!
	26	First of all, ensure that both the [web server](Server-configuration) and [Shaarli](Shaarli-configuration) are correctly configured, and that your installation is [supported](Server-requirements).[](.html)
	27
	28	If everything looks right but the issue(s) remain(s), please:
	29	- take a look at the [troubleshooting](Troubleshooting) section[](.html)
	30	- come [chat with us](https://gitter.im/shaarli/Shaarli) on Gitter, we'll be happy to help ;-)[](.html)
	31	- browse active [issues](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/issues) and [Pull Requests](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/pulls)[](.html)
	32	- if you find one that is related to the issue, feel free to comment and provide additional details (host/Shaarli setup)
	33	- else, [open a new issue](https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/issues/new), and provide information about the problem:[](.html)
	34	- _what happens?_ - display glitches, invalid data, security flaws...
	35	- _what is your configuration?_ - OS, server version, activated extensions, web browser...
	36	- _is it reproducible?_
	37
	38	### Why not use a real database? Files are slow!
	39
	40	Does browsing [this page](http://sebsauvage.net/links/) feel slow? Try browsing older pages, too.[](.html)
	41
	42	It's not slow at all, is it? And don't forget the database contains more than 16000 links, and it's on a shared host, with 32000 visitors/day for my website alone. And it's still damn fast. Why?
	43
	44	The data file is only 3.7 Mb. It's read 99% of the time, and is probably already in the operation system disk cache. So generating a page involves no I/O at all most of the time.